I cannot pass a vote, because none of the three actually tick the box for me.
First, I tried to read that link and could only stomach so much.
I would say this: if one of the couple found out DURING their marriage that they have aspergers, then yes, this article could pretty much be accurate in "some" cases.
But what if a person KNOWINGLY gets involved with an aspie? That is a totally different story, because they put themselves in the role of apparent saviour of the aspie.
But even the first one is still way off base, because it has to take a disfynctional partner to continue to react so negativily when it is discovered that all along their partner had a valid reason for how they behaved and thus, should make both partners work together on achieving harmony, where this article is HEAVILY suggesting that it is all one sided. That it is the aspie's fault for all the suffering.
I was told today, by a spiritual sister, that she highly suspects her daughter is married to an aspie and guess what? He treats her like a QUEEN; he adores the ground she walks on and is very romantic and she feels treasured by him, yet she is an NT.
The conclusion has to be, that the NT partner is wanting to be a victim themselves.
I am finding this a lot in my own case. That most expect me to do all the hard work. I should be the one to fit into the NT world.
I am taking a stand against this and say to them: I have existed in YOUR world for years, so now it is my turn to have down time. Which means that I know longer will accept social gatherings and I achieved this recently. I refuse to go along now, because of the headache it gives me and some noticed and actually accept my reasoning and even more said that yes, ones with aspergers do tend to find social gatherings very stressful.