total-recoil
Well-Known Member
I never mentioned this before but as I think about it, it's fair to say I was obsessed by The Beatles from early childhood. I recall the way it started quite clearly. I used to listen to radio Luxemburg with those white ear plugs while in bed late at night curled up with a pocket transistor radio. One night, the DJ played this song that blew me away totally. It was Strawberry Fields Forever. So, I found out that it was a Beatles song and started to try and listen to more records but at that time I only had a mono cassette recorder. Anyway the first album I got was Revolver and I recall quite well the other kids at school used to make wise-cracks to the effect they were all into punk rock while I was still back in a time warp. However, this understanding you should never be into something just on a trend basis (to be like eveyone else) always persisted with me. I mean, if I like something I don't care about fashion.
Anyway, in time, I got my hands on Sgt Pepper and that really blew me away too. When my parents were out I'd play it loud in stereo together with the vinly Beatles 1967 - 70 album with that photo taken on a roof.
So, after many many years, I still find myself intrigued by The Beatles although now I tend to analyse the music a lot more now that I write my own material. You know, I was reading something online the other day where a guy stated he thought The Beatles were totally over-rated and that more modern bands such as Queen or U2 were better. The critic made his argument quite well but I think the point he missed was The Beatles went far deeper than just being a good band. For a start, their music was hugely diverse. They didn't just do the odd ballad or rock song but crossed vast boundaries. Like When I'm 64 is a song your grandad would enjoy, Get Back is a solid rock song, Tomorrow Never Knows is way out and trippy and they say Helter Skelter may have been the origin of heavy metal today.
There is more. Not only were The Beatles diverse but they became a cultural phenomenon. That is, unlike bands today they stood for a kind of revolutionary set of values that challenged the status quo. It may be fair to say The Beatles weren't the only band that got on the tune in, turn on, drop out bandwaggon but they were right at the forefront. This is something I really miss about music today which is so often studio based, boring, conformist shallow material that all sounds the same. Even Queen who I admit were brilliant composers and performers didn't really stand out with any message or cultural challenge to the establishment through experimentation with new sounds and radical lyrics.
Anyway, having got that out of my system I happen to know a great deal about The Beatles. The whole story of how they were discovered by Brian Epstein in Hamburg/Liverpool is a fascinating story of how four working class musicians became mega stars. The weird part of it no studio really wanted anything to do with them and it took Epstein a huge amount of work and effort to get them fixed up with a label. The rest is history.
Anyway if you have any similar thoughts on this, feel free to join in. It may well be I'm an isolated case on the forum and most people long since left the Beatles era or never even heard much of the music.
Anyway, in time, I got my hands on Sgt Pepper and that really blew me away too. When my parents were out I'd play it loud in stereo together with the vinly Beatles 1967 - 70 album with that photo taken on a roof.
So, after many many years, I still find myself intrigued by The Beatles although now I tend to analyse the music a lot more now that I write my own material. You know, I was reading something online the other day where a guy stated he thought The Beatles were totally over-rated and that more modern bands such as Queen or U2 were better. The critic made his argument quite well but I think the point he missed was The Beatles went far deeper than just being a good band. For a start, their music was hugely diverse. They didn't just do the odd ballad or rock song but crossed vast boundaries. Like When I'm 64 is a song your grandad would enjoy, Get Back is a solid rock song, Tomorrow Never Knows is way out and trippy and they say Helter Skelter may have been the origin of heavy metal today.
There is more. Not only were The Beatles diverse but they became a cultural phenomenon. That is, unlike bands today they stood for a kind of revolutionary set of values that challenged the status quo. It may be fair to say The Beatles weren't the only band that got on the tune in, turn on, drop out bandwaggon but they were right at the forefront. This is something I really miss about music today which is so often studio based, boring, conformist shallow material that all sounds the same. Even Queen who I admit were brilliant composers and performers didn't really stand out with any message or cultural challenge to the establishment through experimentation with new sounds and radical lyrics.
Anyway, having got that out of my system I happen to know a great deal about The Beatles. The whole story of how they were discovered by Brian Epstein in Hamburg/Liverpool is a fascinating story of how four working class musicians became mega stars. The weird part of it no studio really wanted anything to do with them and it took Epstein a huge amount of work and effort to get them fixed up with a label. The rest is history.
Anyway if you have any similar thoughts on this, feel free to join in. It may well be I'm an isolated case on the forum and most people long since left the Beatles era or never even heard much of the music.
Last edited: