My first thread here. It involves my special interest, but it's not entirely about that. It's actually a question about autistic v. NT-behaviour.
My special interest is theatre. As an aside, I suspect acting has helped me with social interaction, even though successful in-person social interaction still means 'faking it' in my world.
BUT. While I like to focus on truthful expression and characterisation to the best of my ability and on the point of the play, I have always been under the impression that most people are there for the purpose of stage hogging. And I get the feeling that it's getting worse. Or perhaps I'm getting entirely too fed up with it.
I'm not denying that performing can give you an ego boost if it goes well (and drag you down if it doesn't), and I don't necessarily have a problem with that. If you got nothing out of it, you wouldn't be doing it, especially unpaid and on your own time.
However, I don't see why acting means you absolutely must try to hog the attention in ways that go well beyond what the role requires - and that might actually hurt it, if looked at from an artistic perspective.
I've been a member of several different groups over time, and it never gets any better. When most of the other people were very young, I blamed it on (extended) adolescence. But as I've got older, the groups I have worked with included people who haven't been teenagers in a long time. And all I can say is that there are even more stage hogs around now than there used to be, at least in my perception.
I find it frustrating because it is alienating me from something I truly love.
I have never come across anyone in amateur theatre who was or whom I suspected to be on the autism spectrum, so I have no comparison. I would suspect that attention hogging for the sake of attention hogging wouldn't suit someone on the autism spectrum, though I may be wrong.
My question is: is this an NT thing? This bad case of the me-me-mes, given half a chance, and at the expense of the thing they purport to be doing, which should be telling the story of the play? What's the logic behind that? Why the effortless switch from telling a story and telling it well to 'look how great I am!', without feeling the need to even justify it?
Or, to turn this around, are people on the autism spectrum not just more likely, but seemingly the only ones interested in the art and not the noise (e.g. trying to get one's small-scale 15 minutes)?
I would be very interested in your opinions and similar or related experiences. I really don't want to believe that people are really that shallow and self-centred, but I'm open to it.
My special interest is theatre. As an aside, I suspect acting has helped me with social interaction, even though successful in-person social interaction still means 'faking it' in my world.
BUT. While I like to focus on truthful expression and characterisation to the best of my ability and on the point of the play, I have always been under the impression that most people are there for the purpose of stage hogging. And I get the feeling that it's getting worse. Or perhaps I'm getting entirely too fed up with it.
I'm not denying that performing can give you an ego boost if it goes well (and drag you down if it doesn't), and I don't necessarily have a problem with that. If you got nothing out of it, you wouldn't be doing it, especially unpaid and on your own time.
However, I don't see why acting means you absolutely must try to hog the attention in ways that go well beyond what the role requires - and that might actually hurt it, if looked at from an artistic perspective.
I've been a member of several different groups over time, and it never gets any better. When most of the other people were very young, I blamed it on (extended) adolescence. But as I've got older, the groups I have worked with included people who haven't been teenagers in a long time. And all I can say is that there are even more stage hogs around now than there used to be, at least in my perception.
I find it frustrating because it is alienating me from something I truly love.
I have never come across anyone in amateur theatre who was or whom I suspected to be on the autism spectrum, so I have no comparison. I would suspect that attention hogging for the sake of attention hogging wouldn't suit someone on the autism spectrum, though I may be wrong.
My question is: is this an NT thing? This bad case of the me-me-mes, given half a chance, and at the expense of the thing they purport to be doing, which should be telling the story of the play? What's the logic behind that? Why the effortless switch from telling a story and telling it well to 'look how great I am!', without feeling the need to even justify it?
Or, to turn this around, are people on the autism spectrum not just more likely, but seemingly the only ones interested in the art and not the noise (e.g. trying to get one's small-scale 15 minutes)?
I would be very interested in your opinions and similar or related experiences. I really don't want to believe that people are really that shallow and self-centred, but I'm open to it.